Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):108-15.

    Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty.

    Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA.

    Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA.

    The investigators reviewed 245 fixed-bearing unicondylar arthroplasties that one surgeon performed as treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis between 1988 and 1997 using a variety of cemented metal-backed tibial components and gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearings. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to evaluate how the event of revision was influenced by 3 patient factors, 3 implant factors, and 7 factors assessed from preoperative and early postoperative radiographs. Five factors were statistically associated with revision: (younger) patient age, (thinner) tibial component initial thickness, (longer) polyethylene shelf age, (lesser) angular reduction of medial tibial plateau varus, and (more varus) postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle. Besides illustrating deleterious consequences of using gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty, our results support reducing varus angulation of the medial tibial plateau and knee at surgery.

    PMID: 16950071 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read

    Recent activity

    Your browsing activity is temporarily unavailable.

    Your browsing activity is empty.

    Activity recording is turned off.

    Turn recording back on

    » See more...