Comparison of Structures of Snf2 family enzymes and the RecG helicase. Structural comparison of the S.solfataricus (sso) SSO1653 catalytic domain [cd, (43), the zebrafish (zf) Rad54 cd (68) and T.maritima (tm) RecG (53). The three crystal structures are shown as ribbon models with highlighted secondary structures. DNA molecules bound to SSO1653 and tmRecG are shown as brown ribbon model. The two RecA-like domains (1A: orange, 2A: green) are shared across DExx box ATPases, and form the ATP-binding site in their interface cleft. The location of the ATP-binding site, as well as locations of the seven conserved helicase-related ATPase/DNA-binding motifs (Ia,I,II,III,IV,V,VI) are indicated in tmRecG. The two RecA-like domains interact with additional domains (1B and 2B: blue) that are suggested to convert ATP-driven rearrangements of 1A and 2A into the translocase or DNA unwinding function. For instance, these domains bind to the replication fork substrate in RecG, which is dragged like a plough through DNA by the action of the translocase module. The role of the helical domains of Snf2 family enzymes is not as well understood, but they could play a role in advancing the enzyme by ATP-driven conformational changes. Note that domain 2 of SSO1653 (2A and 2B) is flipped by 180° with respect to more typical conformations found in zfRad54cd and RecG (double arrow). This flip could represent an open conformation during substrate uptake.