Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;90(12):1481-5. Epub 2006 Aug 16.

Retention time for corticosteroid-sparing systemic immunosuppressive agents in patients with inflammatory eye disease.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.

Erratum in

  • Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;92(4):584.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Multiple immunosuppressive drugs have been used to manage inflammatory eye disease when control cannot be achieved by corticosteroid alone. However, although clinical studies support the effectiveness of most of these agents, comparative studies have not been undertaken. Retention time, a measure of the duration of treatment with any given drug, is a crude indicator of drug effectiveness and tolerability that facilitates such a comparison. The retention time was compared for corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents in patients attending our tertiary referral inflammatory eye disease clinic.

METHODS:

The clinical records of all patients attending an inflammatory eye disease clinic at the Casey Eye Institute over a 1-year period (2003) were reviewed. From these records, we collected the following clinical data: age; sex; ocular diagnosis; and use of steroid-sparing systemic immunosuppression, including drugs, duration of treatment and, if ceased, reasons for cessation. Cox regression analysis, adjusted for clustering, was used to compare other drugs against methotrexate.

RESULTS:

107 of 302 (35%) patients seen at the inflammatory eye disease clinic in 2003 had a total of 193 current or past prescriptions for systemic steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents. The treated group, most of whom had uveitis, included 32 men and 75 women, aged 5-86 years. Most commonly prescribed were methotrexate (66 uses, 34%), ciclosporin (37 uses, 19%), azathioprine (26 uses, 13%), mycophenolate mofetil (22 uses, 11%) and cyclophosphamide (15 uses, 8%). Patients were retained significantly less on ciclosporin (p = 0.004), azathioprine (p = 0.04), mycophenolate mofetil (p = 0.04) and cyclophosphamide (p<0.001) compared with methotrexate. Reasons for cessation included adverse events, lack of effectiveness, success or remission, cost and desire for fertility.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with inflammatory eye disease, methotrexate may offer a superior combination of effectiveness and tolerability over other commonly used corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents. In this study, there was a twofold risk of not being retained on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and ciclosporin and a fourfold risk of not being retained on cyclophosphamide compared with methotrexate.

PMID:
16914474
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1857545
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

Figure 1
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk