Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Observational studies suggest that skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) can improve conduit flow and length and reduce deep sternal infections and postoperative pain. We performed a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison of skeletonized and nonskeletonized ITAs in patients undergoing coronary surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

Patients (n = 48) undergoing bilateral ITA harvest were randomized to receive 1 skeletonized and 1 nonskeletonized ITA. Intraoperatively, ITA flow was assessed directly and with a Doppler flow probe before and after topical application of papaverine. ITA harvest time and conduit length were recorded. A blinded assessment of pain (visual analog scale) and dysesthesia (physical examination) was performed at discharge, at 2 weeks, and at a 3-month follow-up. Sternal perfusion was assessed with nuclear imaging (n = 7). Skeletonization required longer ITA harvest times (27 +/- 1 versus 24 +/- 1 minutes; P = 0.04). There was a trend toward increased ITA length in the skeletonized group (18.2 +/- 0.3 versus 17.7 +/- 0.3 cm; P = 0.09). In situ ITA flow was lower in skeletonized arteries (7.4 +/- 0.9 versus 10.1 +/- 1.0 mL/min; P = 0.01) and increased significantly after ITA division and papaverine application. Postanastomotic flows were similar between groups. Skeletonization was associated with decreased pain at the 3-month follow-up and a reduction in major sensory deficits at the 4-week and 3-month (17% versus 50%; P = 0.002) follow-ups. Baseline adjusted sternal perfusion was significantly greater by 17 +/- 6% (P = 0.03) on the skeletonized side.

CONCLUSIONS:

Skeletonization results in reduced postoperative pain and dysesthesia and increased sternal perfusion at follow-up but does not produce increased conduit flow. ITA skeletonization may be a strategy for reducing morbidity after CABG.