Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Rheumatol Int. 2006 Nov;27(1):67-71. Epub 2006 Aug 2.

    Serious infections under treatment with TNF-alpha antagonists compared to traditional DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

    Source

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey. nevsun@superonline.com

    Abstract

    Biological treatments aiming to neutralize TNF-alpha (tumour necrosis factor alpha) (infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept) are increasingly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although increased frequency has not been observed in randomized clinical trials with TNF-alpha antagonist agents, postmarketing surveillance suggests that infections might be serious consequences of these therapies. Our aim was to compare infections in patients with RA under treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and TNF-alpha antagonists in a university outpatient rheumatology clinic in Turkey. A total of 130 RA patients treated with DMARDs and 48 treated with TNF-alpha antagonists were analysed for the incidence of infections. Patients taking TNF-alpha antagonists were also reviewed for infections before these therapies. The incidence of serious infections was 7/100 patient-years before TNF-alpha antagonists and 8.6/100 patient-years in DMARDs group. The incidence rose to 17/100 patient-years during therapy with TNF-alpha antagonists. In patients with RA on routine follow-up, treatment with TNF-alpha antagonists seems to carry an increased risk of infections compared to traditional DMARDs.

    PMID:
    16896990
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Springer

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk