Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1538-43. Epub 2006 Jul 17.

    Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes.

    Kolås T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Øian P.

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway. toril.kolas@sykehuset-innlandet.no

    Comment in:

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine neonatal outcomes among women with a planned cesarean and a planned vaginal delivery at term. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective survey was conducted on 18,653 singleton deliveries that represent 24 maternity units during a 6-month period. The data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and analyzed according to intended mode of delivery. RESULTS: Compared with planned vaginal deliveries, planned cesarean delivery increased transfer rates to the neonatal intensive care unit from 5.2% to 9.8% (P < .001). The risk for pulmonary disorders (transient tachypnea of the newborn infant and respiratory distress syndrome) rose from 0.8% to 1.6% (P = .01). There were no significant differences in the risks for low Apgar score and neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSION: A planned cesarean delivery doubled both the rate of transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and the risk for pulmonary disorders, compared with a planned vaginal delivery.

    PMID: 16846577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read Click here to read