Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Ambul Pediatr. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):210-4.

Pain relief for neonatal circumcision: a follow-up of residency training practices.

Author information

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry and Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong, Rochester, NY 14621-3095, USA. Daniel_yawman@urmc.Rochester.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess current training practices regarding the provision of effective analgesia for routine newborn circumcision.

METHODS:

All family practice (FP), obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN), and pediatric (PED) residency program directors in the United States received a mailed survey in 2003 (N = 940).

RESULTS:

Survey responses were received from 86% (811/940) of the programs (FP 88%, OB/GYN 82%, and PED 87%). Eighty-two percent (669/811) of all programs surveyed taught circumcision (FP 95%, OB/GYN 89%, and PED 49%). Of programs that taught circumcision, 97% (648/669) taught the administration of an anesthetic, either locally or topically. This proportion is significantly higher than that reported in 1998 (71%, 374/527; P < .001). However, of these same programs that taught circumcision, the anesthetic techniques were used frequently or always in only 84%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The percentage of training programs that teach effective analgesia for neonatal circumcision increased dramatically since the time of the previous data collection. Despite this improvement in teaching practices, some training programs may not consistently use effective analgesia for neonatal circumcision.

PMID:
16843252
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk