Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 700,000 Social Security beneficiaries in the U.S. with psychiatric disabilities have been assigned a representative payee to manage their funds but it is unclear how those judged to need a payee differ from others and whether payee assignment improves clinical outcomes, especially substance abuse.

METHODS:

Participants in this observational 12-month cohort study (n=1457) received SSI or SSDI and had serious mental illness. They were subsequently enrolled at eighteen community-based sites that provided Assertive Community Treatment. Social Security administrative records were used to determine whether a payee had been assigned.

RESULTS:

At baseline, participants who were assigned a payee were more likely to have schizophrenia and had more severe clinician-rated drug and alcohol use than those not assigned a payee. In GEE models that adjusted for these and other potentially confounding covariates, participants assigned a payee between 4 and 12 months after program entry subsequently used significantly more psychiatric services than participants not assigned payees but showed no greater reduction in substance use.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although substance use is associated with being assigned a payee, substance use does not decline substantially following payee assignment. Participants assigned payees made greater subsequent use of psychiatric services, suggesting the potential for benefit from payee assignment.