Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Retina. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(6):679-83.

Prefilled syringe needles versus standard removable needles for intravitreous injection.

Author information

  • 1Jacobs Retina Center, University of California San Diego, Shiley Eye Center, La Jolla 92037, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate differences in the scleral resistance between standard disposable 27 gauge (G) needle versus the Macugen prefilled syringe needle.

METHODS:

Observational study at one eye center. One injecting physician performed 46 intravitreous injections using standard Becton Dickinson 27 G needles and 71 intravitreous injections using Macugen needles during January to May 2005. The procedure in two patients was videotaped and analyzed frame by frame. Microphotographs of used needles were analyzed.

RESULTS:

There were no complications during the injection procedure in either group. Microphotographic analysis after injection revealed 3 and 5 facets on standard 27 G needle and Macugen needles, respectively. The bevel forming the tip of the 27 G needle was steeper and longer than that of the Macugen needle. The inside diameter in the standard 27 G needle was 220 microm versus 210 microm in the Macugen needle.

CONCLUSION:

There are differences in needle design between commonly used disposable 27 G needles and 27 G Macugen needles which result in higher resistance to penetration with Macugen needle. Careful needle design is an important concern in manufacturing prefilled syringes with needles attached to them.

PMID:
16829812
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk