Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul;448:52-7.

    Comparison of femoral head penetration using RSA and the Martell method.

    Source

    Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory and the Adult Reconstructive Unit of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02114, USA. cbragdon@partners.org

    Abstract

    Radiostereometry has high precision and accuracy measuring polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty but requires a specialized setup. The Martell method is simpler and can be used on larger populations. The hypothesis that the radiostereometry analysis and the Martell analysis would yield comparable wear data from the same group of patients having total hip arthroplasty was tested. A group of twenty-five total hip arthroplasty patients who had both radiostereometry and standard anterior-posterior pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs of sufficient quality for analysis were identified. The films were taken at postoperative periods of 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Femoral head penetration was measured by both methods at each time point. The median penetration rates measured by each method decreased over time. Penetration results were affected by method of analysis, time, and dimension, with greater penetration for Martell compared with radiostereometry at each time point, greater penetration with increasing time for each method, and larger three-dimensional magnitude compared with two-dimensional analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series Level IV. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

    PMID:
    16826096
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk