Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):628-47.

Modularity in cognition: framing the debate.

Author information

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. barrett@anthro.ucla.edu

Abstract

Modularity has been the subject of intense debate in the cognitive sciences for more than 2 decades. In some cases, misunderstandings have impeded conceptual progress. Here the authors identify arguments about modularity that either have been abandoned or were never held by proponents of modular views of the mind. The authors review arguments that purport to undermine modularity, with particular attention on cognitive architecture, development, genetics, and evolution. The authors propose that modularity, cleanly defined, provides a useful framework for directing research and resolving debates about individual cognitive systems and the nature of human evolved cognition. Modularity is a fundamental property of living things at every level of organization; it might prove indispensable for understanding the structure of the mind as well.

((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

PMID:
16802884
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk