Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Methods. 2006 Jun;11(2):193-206.

Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?

Author information

  • 1Department of Basic Psychology & Methodology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. hmtania@um.es

Abstract

In meta-analysis, the usual way of assessing whether a set of single studies is homogeneous is by means of the Q test. However, the Q test only informs meta-analysts about the presence versus the absence of heterogeneity, but it does not report on the extent of such heterogeneity. Recently, the I(2) index has been proposed to quantify the degree of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. In this article, the performances of the Q test and the confidence interval around the I(2) index are compared by means of a Monte Carlo simulation. The results show the utility of the I(2) index as a complement to the Q test, although it has the same problems of power with a small number of studies.

PMID:
16784338
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk