Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below

Containment relations in anatomical ontologies.

Author information

  • 1Department of Philosophy, The New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, University of Buffalo, New York, USA.

Abstract

In addition to parthood relations, containment relations are needed for describing the locations of anatomical individuals. My lungs are contained, but not part of, in my thoracic cavity. Urine is contained in, but not part of, the cavity of my urinary bladder. Ontologies such as the FMA and GALEN use containment relations extensively. However, the FMA's and GALEN's usage of containment relations differs significantly. To provide anatomical ontologies with clear semantics and consistent reasoning strategies, it is necessary to precisely determine the logical properties of their containment relations. In this paper, I define different versions of containment relations in a formal theory and distinguish important logical properties of these relations. The formal containment relations are used to partially analyze and highlight differences between the FMA's and GALEN's containment relations.

PMID:
16779031
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1560437
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk