Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Nucl Med Technol. 2006 Jun;34(2):92-9.

A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. prove001@mc.duke.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR.

CONCLUSION:

We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review process. Finally, the principles presented here also can be used as a guide for authors by providing a list of important features to include during manuscript preparation and thereby prospectively address questions that good reviewers are likely to ask.

PMID:
16751587
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk