Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):425-37.

Liver fibrosis: noninvasive diagnosis with double contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.

Author information

  • 1Departments of Radiology, Pathology, and Medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103-8756, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of double contrast material-enhanced (hereafter double-enhanced) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging depiction of hepatic fibrosis, with histopathologic analysis findings as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived the requirement for informed consent. One hundred one patients (58 men, 43 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 52 years +/- 10) who underwent double-enhanced MR imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced and double-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) sequences between 2001 and 2004 and had a reliable reference standard for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis were included. Two blinded MR radiologists retrospectively scored qualitative (reticulation, nodularity, and total scores) and quantitative (contrast-to-noise ratio between hyperintense and hypointense liver regions, coefficient of variation, and noise-corrected coefficient of variation) liver texture features on MR images in consensus. The image scores for patients with advanced (METAVIR fibrosis score >/= 3) versus those for patients with mild (METAVIR score </= 2) fibrosis were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves were determined. Diagnostic performance values were calculated at the optimal operating point. Mann-Whitney U and unpaired Student t tests were performed.

RESULTS:

Qualitative and quantitative image scores were significantly higher for patients with METAVIR fibrosis scores of 3 or higher than for those with scores of 2 or lower (P < .001); on SPIO-enhanced SPGR images, differences increased with increasing echo time. Diagnostic performance for detection of grade 3 or more severe fibrosis was better with the double-enhanced sequence than with the SPIO-enhanced sequences, and qualitative scores had higher diagnostic performance than quantitative scores. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of qualitative scores on double-enhanced SPGR images were higher than 90%.

CONCLUSION:

Advanced hepatic fibrosis can be detected by using double-enhanced MR imaging. Although diagnostic performance depended on the sequence and scoring system used, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values higher than 90% were achievable.

(c) RSNA, 2006.

Comment in

PMID:
16641352
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk