Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):87-105.

Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. asg228@nyu.edu

Abstract

Concern has been raised about the lack of participant compliance in diary studies that use paper-and-pencil as opposed to electronic formats. Three studies explored the magnitude of compliance problems and their effects on data quality. Study 1 used random signals to elicit diary reports and found close matches to self-reported completion times, matches that could not plausibly have been fabricated. Studies 2 and 3 examined the psychometric and statistical equivalence of data obtained with paper versus electronic formats. With minor exceptions, both methods yielded data that were equivalent psychometrically and in patterns of findings. These results serve to at least partially mollify concern about the validity of paper diary methods.

((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Comment in

PMID:
16594769
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk