Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Surg Today. 2006;36(4):295-303.

Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Author information

  • 1Department of General Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.

Abstract

Up until about 15 years ago the only realistic option for end-stage fecal incontinence was the creation of a permanent stoma. There have since been several developments. Dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) and artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) are well-established surgical techniques, which offer the patient a chance for continence restoration and improved quality of life; however, they are unfortunately associated with high morbidity and low success rates. Several trials have been done in an attempt to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and define their place in the second-line treatment of severe, refractory fecal incontinence. This review presents a critical and unbiased overview of the current status of neosphincter surgery according to the available data in the world literature.

PMID:
16554983
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk