Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Dermatol. 2006 Mar;142(3):337-40.

Trends in malpractice premiums for dermatologists: results of a national survey.

Author information

  • Department of Dermatology and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, UCSF Box 0316, San Francisco, CA 94143-0316, USA. resneckj@derm.ucsf.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze professional liability premiums in dermatology and factors associated with premium variation.

DESIGN:

This study examines data from a survey of dermatologists conducted in 2004.

RESULTS:

Survey respondents (n = 1095) reported mean medical liability premiums of $10,898 in 2004 (95% confidence interval, $10,295-$11,501). Premiums increased by 24.4% in 2003 and 16.7% in 2004. There was substantial variation by state, and mean premiums were higher in American Medical Association (AMA)-declared "crisis states" than in those states listed as "currently OK" ($11,669 vs $9527; P = .03). Premium growth from 2002 through 2004 was higher in AMA crisis states and in states without $250 000 caps in place for noneconomic damages. Even when excluding payment for cosmetic riders, premium levels were higher for dermatologists spending more than 10% of their time in cosmetic practice ($13,816 vs $10,185; P<.001) or more than 30% of their time in noncosmetic surgery ($12,551 vs $10,453; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

While premiums paid by dermatologists for professional liability insurance in 2004 were well below those experienced by higher-risk specialties, geographic factors and state tort law variation seem to be affecting dermatology premiums in much the same way they affect the field of medicine as a whole.

PMID:
16549709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk