Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 16;7:140.

    Exploring supervised and unsupervised methods to detect topics in biomedical text.

    Source

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622West, 168th Street, VC-5, NY 10032, USA. ml1065@columbia.edu

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Topic detection is a task that automatically identifies topics (e.g., "biochemistry" and "protein structure") in scientific articles based on information content. Topic detection will benefit many other natural language processing tasks including information retrieval, text summarization and question answering; and is a necessary step towards the building of an information system that provides an efficient way for biologists to seek information from an ocean of literature.

    RESULTS:

    We have explored the methods of Topic Spotting, a task of text categorization that applies the supervised machine-learning technique naïve Bayes to assign automatically a document into one or more predefined topics; and Topic Clustering, which apply unsupervised hierarchical clustering algorithms to aggregate documents into clusters such that each cluster represents a topic. We have applied our methods to detect topics of more than fifteen thousand of articles that represent over sixteen thousand entries in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. We have explored bag of words as the features. Additionally, we have explored semantic features; namely, the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) that are assigned to the MEDLINE records, and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) semantic types that correspond to the MeSH terms, in addition to bag of words, to facilitate the tasks of topic detection. Our results indicate that incorporating the MeSH terms and the UMLS semantic types as additional features enhances the performance of topic detection and the naïve Bayes has the highest accuracy, 66.4%, for predicting the topic of an OMIM article as one of the total twenty-five topics.

    CONCLUSION:

    Our results indicate that the supervised topic spotting methods outperformed the unsupervised topic clustering; on the other hand, the unsupervised topic clustering methods have the advantages of being robust and applicable in real world settings.

    PMID:
    16539745
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1472693
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (4) Free text

    Figure 2
    Figure 4
    Figure 1
    Figure 3

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk