Source
Fleury Institute, Neurophysiology Section, Sao Paulo, Brazil. carlos.heise@fleury.com.br
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To provide reference values and to compare this technique with the standard motor conduction velocity (MCV) of the ulnar nerve.
DESIGN:
Retrospective unmasked study.
SETTING:
Private and institutional practice.
PARTICIPANTS:
The reference group included 57 healthy volunteers. Patients included 100 subjects with suspected ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) referred for neurophysiologic evaluation. This group was subdivided into 2 groups: group A was composed of 45 patients with UNE confirmed by MCV of the ulnar nerve, and group B included 55 patients with suspected UNE in whom the diagnosis could not be established by MCV of the ulnar nerve.
INTERVENTIONS:
Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Differences between peak latencies of ulnar and median mixed nerve action potentials at the arm, after stimulating these nerves at the wrist. This was called mixed latency difference.
RESULTS:
The upper normative limit of the mixed latency difference was 1.1 ms, and there was a significant correlation with height. In group A, the mixed latency difference was abnormal in 80% of the cases and could not be calculated in 18%. In group B, the mixed latency difference was abnormal in 8 (15%) patients. All of these had abnormal "inching" of the ulnar nerve across the elbow.
CONCLUSIONS:
The mixed latency difference was particularly useful in cases of mild UNE.