Detection of CIITA type I, III, and IV isoforms by real-time quantitative PCR in human aortic SMCs. A, Schematic representation of primer design. The first and second exons of CIITA types are depicted. The first exon encodes for the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and the 5′ end of each isoform. Transcription of each individual isoform is directed by 3 different promoters (PI, PIII, PIV). Position of the forward specific primer is shown in the first exon (I F, III F, IV F). For CIITA type III and IV, the TaqMan probes were designed complementary to the first and second exon borders. Reverse primer was common (III) and complementary to the second exon. For CIITA type I, the TaqMan probe and the reverse primer were within the first exon. The size of the amplicons predicted from the cDNA sequence is shown. B, Aortic smooth muscle cell cDNA was amplified with CIITA isoform specific primers by real-time PCR and SYBR green detection. The expression of CIITA type I, III, and IV was measured by SYBR green cycle threshold (Ct) and the products of PCR were also resolved by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. C, RNA from dendritic cells, isolated from human peripheral blood, was extracted and converted to cDNA. Dendritic cell cDNA was amplified with CIITA-specific primers, as in B, and served as a positive control for the expression of all 3 CIITA isoforms. The products of PCR were detected by 1.5% agarose gel. D, Aortic SMCs were treated for 24 hours with or without recombinant IFN-γ (100 U/mL). RNA from 3 wells of cultured cells was extracted, converted to cDNA, and subjected to real-time PCR with TaqMan probes/primers specific for CIITA isoforms. Specific CIITA plasmids were used to construct standard curves and for conversion of Ct values to copy numbers. Results are presented as absolute values and numbers of molecules that are expressed after IFN-γ stimulation. Results are normalized to 18 S ribosomal RNA and error bars represent mean of quadruplicates±SD. The data (n=4) were evaluated for significance by ANOVA followed by Sheffe's post hoc analysis using SPSS software. CIITA type III and CIITA type IV expression was significantly higher than CIITA type I expression. This difference was statistically significant (*P<0.01).