Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 Jan;34(1):54-9. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

[Magnesium sulphate for the management of preeclampsia].

[Article in French]

Author information

  • Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier Poissy-Saint-Germain, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin, 10, rue du Champ-Gaillard, BP 3082, 78303 Poissy cedex, France. prozenberg@chi-poissy-st-germain.fr

Abstract

In case of eclampsia, and especially in case of preeclampsia, no consensus exist in order to treat or to prevent convulsions by routine use of magnesium sulphate, at least in France. However, a large, multicentre, randomised trial compared the efficacy of magnesium sulphate with diazepam or phenytoin in eclamptic women. In this trial, magnesium sulphate was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent seizures and lower rate of maternal death than that observed with other anticonvulsants. The primary objective of magnesium sulphate prophylaxis in women with preeclampsia is to prevent or reduce the rate of eclampsia and complications associated with eclampsia. There are 3 large randomised controlled trials comparing the use of magnesium sulphate to prevent convulsions in patients with severe preeclampsia: the first one was vs phenytoin, the second vs placebo, and the third vs nimodipine. Patients receiving magnesium sulphate presented a significant lower risk of eclampsia than that observed with other comparison groups, probably by decreasing the cerebral perfusion pressure, thus avoiding a cerebral barotrauma. However, several arguments balance a wide use of magnesium sulphate: the prevalence of eclampsia in the Western world is very low, the use of magnesium sulphate does not affect the neonatal morbidity and mortality, and it is associated with a high rate of side effects, sometimes severe, such as respiratory depression. Thus, the benefit to risk ratio has to guide the use of magnesium sulphate and is directly correlated to the prevalence of eclampsia according to the risk of considered group. 1) The rate of seizures in women with mild preeclampsia not receiving magnesium sulphate is very low. Magnesium sulphate may potentially be associated with a higher number of adverse maternal effects. Therefore, the benefit to risk ratio does not support routine use of magnesium sulphate prophylaxis in this group. 2) On the other hand, the higher rate of seizures in women with severe preeclampsia (2.0%), especially in those who have imminent eclampsia, justifies prophylaxis with magnesium sulphate.

PMID:
16406662
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk