Validity of anogenital distance as a marker of in ...[Environ Health Perspect. 2006] - PubMed Result

Search for

Advanced Search (beta)

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 0

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jan;114(1):A19-20; author reply A20-1. Links

Comment in:: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):A399; author reply A399.
Comment on:: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1056-61.

Validity of anogenital distance as a marker of in utero phthalate exposure.

McEwen GN Jr, Renner G.

PMID: 16393642 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PMCID: PMC1332693

Related Articles

Prenatal phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in male infants. [Environ Health Perspect. 2006]
Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. [Environ Health Perspect. 2005]
Phthalate exposure during pregnancy and lower anogenital index in boys: wider implications for the general population? [Environ Health Perspect. 2005]
Possible impact of phthalates on infant reproductive health. [Int J Androl. 2006]
Disruption of reproductive development in male rat offspring following in utero exposure to phthalate esters. [Int J Androl. 2006]
» See all Related Articles...

Display Show