Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Assess. 2005 Dec;17(4):415-22.

Deconstructing, reconstructing, preserving Paul E. Meehl's legacy of construct validity.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. bam@wjh.harvard.edu

Abstract

The question of the status of cause-and-effect explanations of human behavior that posit physically existing causative factors and those that, on the other hand, posit hypothetical entities in the form of "useful fictions" has a long history. The influence of the works of Jeremy Bentham and Hans Vaihinger, as well as the later influence of Francis Galton, is described. Issues of the validity of hypothetical constructs and related problems of measurement and definition as found in psychoanalytic theory construction and in trait theory are examined. The significant and continuing interest generated by the landmark studies of K. MacCorquodale and P. E. Meehl (1948) and L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl (1955) as well as the central importance of P. E. Meehl's thinking are described.

PMID:
16393008
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk