Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Apr;366(1-2):112-29. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

Testing experimental data for univariate normality.

Author information

  • Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1. ahenders@uwo.ca

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Many experimentally-derived data sets are generated in the practice of clinical chemistry. Graphical presentation is essential to assess the data distribution. The distribution must also be assessed quantitatively. These approaches will determine if the data is Normal or not. Finally the results of these tests of Normality must be shown to be free of sample size effects.

METHODS:

Four experimentally-derived data sets were used. They represented normal, positive kurtotic, positive- and negatively-skewed distributions. These data sets were examined by graphical techniques, by moment tests, by tests of Normality, and monitored for sample size effects.

RESULTS:

The preferred graphical techniques are the histogram and the box-and-whisker plots that may be supplemented, with advantage, by quantile-quantile or probability-probability plots. Classical tests of skewness and kurtosis can produce conflicting and often confusing results and, as a consequence, the alternative use of the newer L-moments is advocated. Normality tests included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (Lilliefors modification), Cramér-von Mises and Anderson-Darling tests (empirical distribution function statistics) and the Gan-Koehler, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, and Filliben tests (regression/correlation techniques). Of these only the Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, and Shapiro-Francia tests correctly classified all four test samples. The effect of sample size on the resulting p-value was investigated using Royston's V'/v' graphical test.

CONCLUSIONS:

A systematic approach to Normality testing should follow the route of graphical presentation, the use of L-moments, the use of Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, or Shapiro-Francia testing, and Royston's sample size monitoring.

PMID:
16388793
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk