Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;21(1):11-20. Epub 2005 Dec 27.

    Meta-analysis of drop-out rates in randomised clinical trials, comparing typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Source

    Department of Clinical Research, Castilla-La Mancha Health Research Foundation (FISCAM), Edificio Bulevar, C/Berna, No. 2, Local 0-2, 45003 Toledo, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. jlrmartin@jccm.es

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    To assess antipsychotic medication in the treatment of schizophrenia, based on trial drop-out rates.

    METHOD:

    The studies included were randomised controlled trials that compared any of the four clinically best-established atypical antipsychotics (quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone or clozapine) against either of two typical antipsychotics regarded as the gold standard (haloperidol or chlorpromazine).

    RESULTS:

    Meta-analysis indicated less risk of all-cause patient withdrawal from atypical medication trials where dosage was flexible, in both the short, relative risk (RR) 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76), P<0.00001, and long term, RR 0.72 (0.65-0.80), P<0.00001. Similar results were observed for withdrawal due to adverse events, RR: 0.54 (0.41-0.72), P<0.0001. Nevertheless, the favourable effects of atypical medication disappeared in trials relying on fixed dosage.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    We detected a significant positive effect in terms of the outcome of treatment discontinuation for atypical versus typical medication, though only where the use of flexible rather than fixed doses (closer to an experimental control situation) was possible.

    PMID:
    16380237
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk