Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1359-78.

Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic.

Author information

  • 1Department of General and Experimental Psychology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. volker.franz@psychol.uni-giessen.de

Abstract

The authors tested whether the effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping are corrected during late phases of the movement. Surprisingly, the grasp aperture was corrected neither under no-vision (N = 52) nor under full-vision (N = 48) conditions. The authors show that previous reports of a correction (e.g., S. Glover & P. Dixon, 2002a) are due to 2 artifacts: (a) inclusion of time points at which the target object was already touched and (b) erroneous statistics. This removes the central evidence on which S. Glover and P. Dixon's (2001a) planning-control model of action is based. In addition, the authors' results can help to refine more classic notions of motor control (e.g., R. Woodworth, 1899). In consequence, the authors reject S. Glover and P. Dixon's (2001a) planning-control model but not classic online-control theories.

(c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

PMID:
16366795
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk