Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 20;143(12):881-94.

    Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Source

    University of Pittsburgh and the Veterans Affairs Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, USA.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Despite the development of evidence-based pneumonia guidelines, limited data exist on the most effective means to implement guideline recommendations into clinical practice.

    OBJECTIVE:

    To compare the effectiveness and safety of 3 guideline implementation strategies.

    DESIGN:

    Cluster-randomized, controlled trial.

    SETTING:

    32 emergency departments in Pennsylvania and Connecticut.

    PATIENTS:

    3219 patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia.

    INTERVENTIONS:

    The authors implemented a project-developed guideline for the initial site of treatment based on the Pneumonia Severity Index and performance of evidence-based processes of care at the emergency department level. Guideline implementation strategies were defined as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 12), and high intensity (n = 12).

    MEASUREMENTS:

    Effectiveness outcomes were the rate at which low-risk patients were treated on an outpatient basis and the performance of recommended processes of care. Safety outcomes included death, subsequent hospitalization for outpatients, and medical complications for inpatients.

    RESULTS:

    More low-risk patients (n = 1901) were treated as outpatients in the moderate-intensity and high-intensity groups than in the low-intensity group (high-intensity group, 61.9%; moderate-intensity group, 61.0%; low-intensity group, 37.5%; P = 0.004). More outpatients (n = 1125) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 60.9%; moderate-intensity group, 28.3%; low-intensity group, 25.3%; P < 0.001); more inpatients (n = 2076) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 44.3%; moderate-intensity group, 30.1%; low-intensity group, 23.0%; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in safety outcomes were observed across interventions.

    LIMITATIONS:

    Twenty percent of eligible patients were not enrolled, and data on effectiveness outcomes were not collected before the trial.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Both moderate-intensity and high-intensity guideline implementation strategies safely increased the proportion of low-risk patients with pneumonia who were treated as outpatients. The high-intensity strategy was most effective for increasing the performance of the recommended processes of care for outpatients and inpatients.

    PMID:
    16365469
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk