Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2407-14.

Does minimally invasive vein harvesting technique affect the quality of the conduit for coronary revascularization?

Author information

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The effect of minimally invasive great saphenous vein harvest on patient morbidity (wound infection and other healing disturbances) has been extensively investigated, yet its impact on the quality of the venous conduit is less well known. This study aims to review the literature with regard to macroscopic quality, postoperative myocardial infarction rates, and angiographic patency of the minimally invasive versus conventionally harvested vein using meta-analytic techniques where appropriate. Results suggest that conduits are comparable in macroscopic quality with minimally invasively harvested veins requiring more repairs prior to grafting. Postoperative myocardial infarction rates were not significantly different between groups, which is supported by the limited evidence on angiographic patency.

PMID:
16305930
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Health
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk