Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):514-26.

Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors.

Author information

  • 1Behavioral Neurogenetics Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford University, CA 94305-5719, USA. hallss@stanford.edu

Abstract

In this study, the outcomes of descriptive, experimental and informant-based methods of functional assessment were compared in four individuals with developmental disabilities who showed problem behaviors. Results indicated that the descriptive and experimental assessments were concordant in only one of the four cases whilst informant-based and experimental assessments were concordant in three of the four cases. The descriptive assessment identified thin schedules of attention in all cases. These results appear to question the usefulness of employing descriptive assessments for problem behaviors either as an adjunct or replacement for experimental assessments, particularly given their time-consuming nature.

PMID:
16303582
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk