Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;73(5):924-35.

    Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments.

    Source

    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA. s.baldwin@mac.com

    Abstract

    When treatments are administered in groups, clients interact in ways that lead to violations of a key assumption of most statistical analyses-the assumption of independence of observations. The resulting dependencies, when not properly accounted for, can increase Type I errors dramatically. Of the 33 studies of group-administered treatment on the empirically supported treatments list, none appropriately analyzed their data. The current authors provide corrections that can be applied to improper analyses. After the corrections, only 12.4% to 68.2% of tests that were originally reported as significant remained significant, depending on what assumptions were made about how large the dependencies among observations really are. Of the 33 studies, 6-19 studies no longer had any significant results after correction. The authors end by providing recommendations for researchers planning group-administered treatment research.

    ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

    PMID:
    16287392
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for American Psychological Association

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk