Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Jan;95(2):125-9.

The (mis)classification of chemo-fog--methodological inconsistencies in the investigation of cognitive impairment after chemotherapy.

Author information

  • 1Cancer Research UK Psychosocial Oncology Group, Brighton and Sussex Medical School University of Sussex, Falmer East Sussex, UK. v.m.shilling@sussex.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A growing number of studies report cognitive impairment after chemotherapy; indeed the phenomenon of chemo-fog is now almost universally accepted. We are concerned however that there is little if any consistency in the way in which patients are classified as showing cognitive impairment or not. We aim to demonstrate that different methods of analysis produce markedly different results, making the true extent of impairment unclear.

METHODS:

We analysed data from 92 breast cancer patients 4 weeks post-chemotherapy and from 42 healthy controls using 7 different methods, each taken from a different research paper in the area of cognitive impairment post-chemotherapy.

FINDINGS:

The extent of impairment was dependent on the method of analysis. Impairment ranged from 12 to 68.5% in the chemotherapy group and from 4.8 to 64.3% in the healthy control group.

INTERPRETATION:

This brief report highlights the contrasting degrees of cognitive impairment calculated by using legitimate statistical methods and demonstrates the need for a collaborative effort to standardise our methods that we might better understand the phenomenon of chemo-fog.

PMID:
16261398
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk