Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMJ. 2005 Nov 5;331(7524):1064-5. Epub 2005 Oct 17.

Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources.

Author information

  • 1Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London Medical School, Holborn Union Building, London N19 5LW. p.greenhalgh@pcps.ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To describe where papers come from in a systematic review of complex evidence. Method Audit of how the 495 primary sources for the review were originally identified.

RESULTS:

Only 30% of sources were obtained from the protocol defined at the outset of the study (that is, from the database and hand searches). Fifty one per cent were identified by "snowballing" (such as pursuing references of references), and 24% by personal knowledge or personal contacts.

CONCLUSION:

Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies.

PMID:
16230312
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1283190
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk