Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 14;6:256.

Evaluating eukaryotic secreted protein prediction.

Author information

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Mayo Mail Code 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. klee0025@tc.umn.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Improvements in protein sequence annotation and an increase in the number of annotated protein databases has fueled development of an increasing number of software tools to predict secreted proteins. Six software programs capable of high throughput and employing a wide range of prediction methods, SignalP 3.0, SignalP 2.0, TargetP 1.01, PrediSi, Phobius, and ProtComp 6.0, are evaluated.

RESULTS:

Prediction accuracies were evaluated using 372 unbiased, eukaryotic, SwissProt protein sequences. TargetP, SignalP 3.0 maximum S-score and SignalP 3.0 D-score were the most accurate single scores (90-91% accurate). The combination of a positive TargetP prediction, SignalP 2.0 maximum Y-score, and SignalP 3.0 maximum S-score increased accuracy by six percent.

CONCLUSION:

Single predictive scores could be highly accurate, but almost all accuracies were slightly less than those reported by program authors. Predictive accuracy could be substantially improved by combining scores from multiple methods into a single composite prediction.

PMID:
16225690
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1276785
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk