Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005 Oct;18(8):430-5.

Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in-vivo study.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine which method of maggot debridement therapy--free-range or contained--is more effective for wound healing.

METHODS:

In vivo study of 64 patients with 69 chronic wounds that showed signs of gangrenous or necrotic tissue. Patients were treated with either free-range or contained maggot debridement therapy according to maggot availability, dressing difficulty, and physician preference.

RESULTS:

Significantly better outcomes were achieved with the free-range technique versus the contained technique (P = .028). With the free-range technique, the mean number of maggot applications and the total number of maggots per treatment were significantly lower than with the contained application technique (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

This clinical in vivo study supports in vitro studies in which containment of maggots was found to reduce the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy.

PMID:
16217155
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk