Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Pediatr Res. 2005 Oct;58(4):761-5.

Actigraphy correctly predicts sleep behavior in infants who are younger than six months, when compared with polysomnography.

Author information

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

Actigraphy has been widely used in adults and children. In infants, validation of actigraphy has typically used a comparison with behaviorally determined sleep state classification rather than polysomnography (PSG). This study validated actigraphy against PSG for determining sleep and waking states in infants who were younger than 6 mo. Twenty-two healthy infants, 13 term and 9 preterm, were studied at three different matched postconceptional ages. Actigraph data were compared with PSG recordings in 1-min epochs. Agreement rate (AR), predictive value for sleep, predictive value for wake, sensitivity. and specificity were calculated and compared between activity thresholds and across ages with two-way ANOVA for repeated measures. Thirty-two validation studies were analyzed. Overall AR with PSG of 93.7 +/- 1.3 and 91.6 +/- 1.8 were obtained at 2-4 wk and 5-6 mo, respectively, at the low activity threshold setting, whereas the auto activity threshold gave the best agreement with PSG at 2-4 mo (AR 89.3 +/- 1.3%). Sensitivity values of 96.2 +/- 1.1% at 2-4 wk, 91.2 +/- 1.5% at 2-4 mo, and 94.0 +/- 1.9% were obtained at these same settings. There was no difference across ages in AR or sensitivity. PVW and specificity values were low in this study. We conclude that actigraphy is a valid method for monitoring sleep in infants who are younger than 6 mo.

PMID:
16189206
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk