Focal area of ground-glass opacity and ground-glass opacity predominance on thin-section CT: discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions

Clin Radiol. 2005 Sep;60(9):1006-17. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.006.

Abstract

Aim: To reveal differences in thin-section computed tomography (CT) findings between lung neoplastic lesions and non-neoplastic lesions, which showed a focal area of ground-glass opacity or ground-glass opacity predominance.

Materials and methods: A total of 82 focal areas of ground-glass opacity and ground-glass opacity predominance, consisting of 38 neoplastic and 44 non-neoplastic lesions, were assessed retrospectively regarding their thin-section CT findings.

Results: The frequency of wholly well-defined margin (p=0.001), spiculation (p=0.019), pleural indentation (p=0.016), air bronchograms (p=0.027), air-containing space (p=0.004) was significantly higher in neoplastic lesions than in non-neoplastic lesions. Thirty-four of 38 (89%) neoplastic lesions were well-defined in more than 50% of the circumference, of which nine had an air-containing space other than air bronchogram, whereas only one non-neoplastic lesion had these features.

Conclusion: A focal area of ground-glass opacity or ground-glass opacity predominance with a well-defined margin and air-containing space is more likely to be a neoplasm.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Lung / diagnostic imaging
  • Lung / pathology
  • Lung Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Lung Diseases / pathology
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*