Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;24(6):737-48.

    Macrolides as biological response modifiers in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis.

    Source

    Department of Pediatric Respirology, Imperial School of Medicine at National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom. a.bush@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

    Abstract

    For 50 years, macrolide antibiotics have been used to treat community acquired pneumonia and atypical infections such as Chlamydia pneumonia and Mycoplasma. In the late 1960s it was noted that when the 14-member ring macrolide antibiotic troleandomycin was given to asthma patients who required large doses of systemic corticosteroids, they could often reduce their steroid dose or even stop steroids completely without exacerbation of their asthma. Because of this experience, Prof. S. Kodoh and colleagues first used erythromycin as an immunomodulatory agent to treat diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB). DPB is a cystic fibrosis (CF)-like condition seen predominantly in young, nonsmoking adults in Japan and Korea. The introduction of erythromycin profoundly improved survival, and in many of these very ill patients the illness disappeared. Since then, research has focused attention on many non-antibacterial, disease modifying effects of this class of compounds. These include downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines via an effect on nuclear transcription factors, reduction in adhesion molecule expression, suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), reduced neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation, inhibition of neutrophil elastase, cytoprotection against bioactive phospholipids, improvement in the rheological properties of mucus, reduction in bronchial hyperreactivity, and, perhaps, modulation of neutrophil death by apoptosis pathways, and in the end, airway remodeling. Additionally, they have unconventional effects on microorganisms, including inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility and thus biofilm formation. There are small case series and three large randomized controlled trials that have established unequivocal evidence of benefit in CF. There is less evidence for an immunomodulatory effect in bronchiectasis. Future work is likely to focus on the development of macrolides with disease-specific modes of action.

    PMID:
    16088589
    [PubMed]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk