Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):581-6.

Sensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up bias.

Author information

  • 1Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

A diagnostic test is put into routine use by being applied to a population with unknown test status and unknown disease status. All subjects with a positive test are then referred to a "gold standard" assessment for the disease. Subjects with a negative test are normally not referred to the "gold standard" assessment. In some cases, the investigators may refer a small random sample of subjects with a negative test to the "gold standard" assessment in order to determine if they really do not have the disease. If "gold standard" results are not available on an entire population, it is well-known that work-up bias, or sequential-ordering bias, exists. In this situation, classical equations for sensitivity and specificity give biased results. This paper describes an equation for estimation of prevalence, and two new equations which calculate sensitivity and specificity from prevalence and predictive values, and which are appropriate for data from this type of "irregular observational design".

Comment in

PMID:
1607897
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk