D-specific binding of Sum1 to HML-E in vitro and in vivo. (A) Sum1 bound in vitro to HML-E, but not the INO1 promoter region. (Left) A radioactively labeled 220-bp HML-E fragment was incubated without protein (lane 1) or with 0.1 μM bacterially expressed 6xHis-Sum1 (lanes 2-4). For competition experiments, unlabeled DNA of HML-E (specific competitor, lane 3) or a 210-bp INO1 fragment (unspecific competitor, lane 4) was added. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a polyacrylamide gel and labeled DNA was visualized by autoradiography. (Right) Sum1 did not bind INO1 DNA, and bacterially expressed 6xHis-β-galactosidase (β-Gal) did not bind HML-E DNA. (Upper arrow) Protein-DNA complex. (Lower arrow) Free DNA. (B) Binding of Sum1 to HML-E required the D element. Mutant versions of HML-E were incubated with Sum1 (+) or without protein (-) and gel-electrophorezed as in A. HML-E DNA containing a mutation in the ACS site is termed ACS- (lanes 3,4,7,8), and HML-E DNA with deletion of the 93-bp D element is termed DΔ (lanes 5-8). To maintain DNA size in the DΔ derivates, the deleted D element was substituted for the genomic 3′-region of equivalent length. All DNA fragments were ∼220 bp. (C) Binding of Sum1 to HML-E required the D2 element. Mutant versions of HML-E were incubated with Sum1 (+) or without protein (-) as in A. (WT) A 134-bp wild-type HML-E fragment containing the ACS and the D element (lanes 1,2); (D2Δ) HML-E without the D2 element (lanes 3,4); (DΔ) a 140-bp HML-E fragment lacking the entire D element (lanes 5,6). (D) Competition between SMK1 and HML-E for Sum1 binding. A radioactively labeled double-stranded 19-bp fragment containing the MSE site of the SMK1 promoter was incubated without protein (lane 1) or with 0.1 μM bacterially expressed 6xHis-Sum1 (lanes 2-4). For competition experiments, unlabeled DNA of HML-E (specific competitor, lane 3) or HML-E DΔ was added. (E) Sum1 was associated in vivo with HML-E in a D-element-dependent manner. ChIPs were performed on sum1Δ strains containing a 2μ plasmid carrying N-terminally 6xmyc-tagged SUM1 under control of its own promoter (pAE1032). (Left) (WT) wild-type HMLα (AEY2); (ΔD) HMLΔDΔI (AEY3391). DNA was immunoprecipitated with (+) or without (-) anti-myc antibody and PCR-amplified. A total of 1/50 or 1/100 of the input DNA (lanes 7,8) or 1/2 (lanes 1,4), 1/4 (lanes 2,5), or 1/8 (lanes 3,6) of the immunoprecipitated DNA was analyzed. As a control, the promoter region of the SMK1 gene was PCR-amplified. (Right) ChIP was performed in sir4Δ strains. Columns indicate the ratio of DNA enrichment with versus without anti-myc antibody: (black columns) 6xmyc Sum1; (white columns) untagged. The Y-axis indicates fold enrichment.