Abstract

Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of native endothiapepsin (EC 3.4.23.6) and 15 endothiapepsin oligopeptide inhibitor complexes defined at high resolution by X-ray crystallography shows that endothiapepsin exists in two forms differing in the relative orientation of a domain comprising residues 190-302. There are relatively few interactions between the two parts of the enzyme; consequently, they can move as separate rigid bodies. A translational, librational, and screw analysis of the thermal parameters of endothiapepsin also supports a model in which the two parts can move relative to each other. In the comparison of different aspartic proteinases, the rms values are reduced by up to 47% when the two parts of the structure are superposed independently. This justifies description of the differences, including those between pepsinogen and pepsin (EC 3.4.34.1), as a rigid movement of one part relative to another although considerable distortions within the domains also occur. The consequence of the rigid body movement is a change in the shape of the active site cleft that is largest around the S3 pocket. This is associated with a different position and conformation of the inhibitors that are bound to the two endothiapepsin forms. The relevance of these observations to a model of the hydrolysis by aspartic proteinases is briefly discussed.