Automatic audiovisual integration in speech perception

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):66-75. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0008-z. Epub 2005 Oct 29.

Abstract

Two experiments aimed to determine whether features of both the visual and acoustical inputs are always merged into the perceived representation of speech and whether this audiovisual integration is based on either cross-modal binding functions or on imitation. In a McGurk paradigm, observers were required to repeat aloud a string of phonemes uttered by an actor (acoustical presentation of phonemic string) whose mouth, in contrast, mimicked pronunciation of a different string (visual presentation). In a control experiment participants read the same printed strings of letters. This condition aimed to analyze the pattern of voice and the lip kinematics controlling for imitation. In the control experiment and in the congruent audiovisual presentation, i.e. when the articulation mouth gestures were congruent with the emission of the string of phones, the voice spectrum and the lip kinematics varied according to the pronounced strings of phonemes. In the McGurk paradigm the participants were unaware of the incongruence between visual and acoustical stimuli. The acoustical analysis of the participants' spoken responses showed three distinct patterns: the fusion of the two stimuli (the McGurk effect), repetition of the acoustically presented string of phonemes, and, less frequently, of the string of phonemes corresponding to the mouth gestures mimicked by the actor. However, the analysis of the latter two responses showed that the formant 2 of the participants' voice spectra always differed from the value recorded in the congruent audiovisual presentation. It approached the value of the formant 2 of the string of phonemes presented in the other modality, which was apparently ignored. The lip kinematics of the participants repeating the string of phonemes acoustically presented were influenced by the observation of the lip movements mimicked by the actor, but only when pronouncing a labial consonant. The data are discussed in favor of the hypothesis that features of both the visual and acoustical inputs always contribute to the representation of a string of phonemes and that cross-modal integration occurs by extracting mouth articulation features peculiar for the pronunciation of that string of phonemes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation / methods
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lipreading*
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation / methods
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Sound Spectrography / methods
  • Speech Acoustics*
  • Speech Perception / physiology*
  • Speech Production Measurement / methods
  • Verbal Learning / physiology
  • Visual Perception / physiology*
  • Vocabulary