Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(4):170-84.

Development of a tool to assess psychosocial indicators of fruit and vegetable intake for 2 federal programs.

Author information

  • 1Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis 95616-8669, USA. mstownsend@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Development of an evaluation tool of psychosocial constructs for use by participants in 2 federal programs, Food Stamp Nutrition Education and the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional data from a longitudinal study.

PARTICIPANTS:

Limited-resource women (n = 111) living in low-income communities.

MEASURES:

Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, ethnic differences, convergent validity.

ANALYSIS:

Spearman rank order correlation, analysis of variance, principal components analysis.

RESULTS:

Reliability coefficients ranged from a low of r = .18 (not significant) to r = .74 (P < .0001). Two items were deleted for not meeting criteria for reliability and 2 for redundancy. Ethnic differences at baseline were significant for 1 item. Domain constructs loaded on 4 to 5 factors for the biopsychosocial framework. Estimates of convergent validity of 9 constructs led to the deletion of 3 (ie, perceived barriers, social support, and perceived norms), with retention of perceived benefits, perceived control, self-efficacy, readiness to eat more fruit, readiness to eat more vegetables, and perceived diet quality. As an estimate of convergent validity, the final version of the tool with 6 constructs remaining showed significant correlations with indicators of diet quality: serum carotenoid values (r = .38, P < .001); hypothesized nutrients calculated from the mean of 3 24-hour dietary recalls (vitamin C, r = .47, P < .0001; vitamin A, r = .39, P < .0001; folate, r = .37, P < .0001; beta-carotene, r =.31, P < .001; and fiber, r = .46, P < .0001); fruit and vegetable servings (r = 0.55, P < .0001); Healthy Eating Index (r = .27, P < .05); and a fruit and vegetable behavioral scale (r = .60, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS:

This systematic process yielded a fruit and vegetable evaluation tool useful for practitioners and researchers. This is the first validation study of this type to estimate convergent validity with 5 indicators of diet quality, including a biomarker.

PMID:
16029687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk