Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):809-12.

    Vinyl chloride: a case study of data suppression and misrepresentation.

    Source

    Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC 20005, USA. jsass@nrdc.org

    Abstract

    When the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized its 2000 update of the toxicological effects of vinyl chloride (VC), it was concerned with two issues: the classification of VC as a carcinogen and the numerical estimate of its potency. In this commentary we describe how the U.S. EPA review of VC toxicology, which was drafted with substantial input from the chemical industry, weakened safeguards on both points. First, the assessment down-plays risks from all cancer sites other than the liver. Second, the estimate of cancer potency was reduced 10-fold from values previously used for environmental decision making, a finding that reduces the cost and extent of pollution reduction and cleanup measures. We suggest that this assessment reflects discredited scientific practices and recommend that the U.S. EPA reverse its trend toward ever-increasing collaborations with the regulated industries when generating scientific reviews and risk assessments.

    PMID:
    16002366
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1257639
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk