Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Paraplegia. 1992 May;30(5):327-32.

    Use of penile prostheses to maintain external condom catheter drainage in spinal cord injury patients.

    Perkash I, Kabalin JN, Lennon S, Wolfe V.

    Department of Urology, Stanford University, California.

    This is a retrospective analysis of 79 spinal cord injury patients who have had penile implants from one to 14 years. The primary indication for implants was the loss of condom catheter with a small retractile penis. Mean period after injury to when the implants were placed was 8.24 years (range 1-21 years). Mean total length of time the implants have been followed was 7.08 years (1-14 years). Sixty patients responded to our detailed questionnaire and they have been subjected to further analysis: prior to the implant 46 patients (77%) frequently lost their condoms. Fourteen of the patients (23%) had indwelling catheters, and 3 (5%) had a suprapubic cystostomy since they could not retain an external condom for urinary drainage because of retraction of a small penis. Post implant, 81% of patients had no accidents involving condom loss, while 19% still lost condoms. All indwelling catheters could be removed except for one patient who continued with a suprapubic catheter following transurethral sphincterotomy (TURS) and a penile implant. Sixty-eight percent used the implant for sex and felt their wives were satisfied. Patient satisfaction survey showed a markedly increased self esteem, increased mobility without fear of condom loss, and an improved sex life. Overall, the long term prosthesis failure rate was 8%. The specific infection complication rate was less than 2%. The Flexirod semirigid, hinged prosthesis proved ideal in meeting the requirements for these patients.

    PMID: 1598171 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content