Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):787-92.

    Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease: a prospective, comparative accuracy study of common tests.

    De Lorijn F, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP, Aronson DC, Ten Kate FJ, Smets AM, Taminiau JA, Benninga MA.

    Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's hospital AMC/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.deloijn@amc.uva.nl

    OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema (CE), anorectal manometry (ARM), and rectal suction biopsy (RSB) for the detection of Hirschsprung's disease (HD). STUDY DESIGN: Following a prospective protocol, infants suspected of HD underwent all 3 index tests. Children with positive results on 2 or more index tests or who continued to have severe bowel problems underwent a full thickness biopsy as reference standard. Clinical follow-up was the reference standard in all other children. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2003, 111 consecutive patients (67 boys; median age, 5.3 months) in whom HD was suspected were enrolled. HD was found in 28 patients. RSB had the highest sensitivity (93%) and specificity (100%) rates, but values were not significantly different from CE (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 97%) or from ARM (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 93%). Inconclusive test results occurred in 8 infants with CE, in 15 infants with ARM because of agitation, and in 2 infants with RSB. CONCLUSION: RSB is the most accurate test for diagnosing HD, and it has the lowest rate of inconclusive test results.

    PMID: 15973319 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read