Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1144-9. Epub 2005 Jun 16.

    The trouble with "MSM" and "WSW": erasure of the sexual-minority person in public health discourse.

    Source

    Department of Women's Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY10032, USA.

    Abstract

    Men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with women (WSW) are purportedly neutral terms commonly used in public health discourse. However, they are problematic because they obscure social dimensions of sexuality; undermine the self-labeling of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people; and do not sufficiently describe variations in sexual behavior.MSM and WSW often imply a lack of lesbian or gay identity and an absence of community, networks, and relationships in which same-gender pairings mean more than merely sexual behavior. Overuse of the terms MSM and WSW adds to a history of scientific labeling of sexual minorities that reflects, and inadvertently advances, heterosexist notions. Public health professionals should adopt more nuanced and culturally relevant language in discussing members of sexual-minority groups.

    Comment in

    PMID:
    15961753
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1449332
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk