Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
1: Can Fam Physician. 2005 May;51:688-95.Click here to read Click here to read Links
Comment in:
Can Fam Physician. 2005 May;51:637-9, 644-6.

Controversies around gestational diabetes. Practical information for family doctors.

McMaster University's Family Medicine North, Sioux Lookout, Ont. lkelly@mcmaster.ca

OBJECTIVE: To summarize some of the issues facing primary care physicians who are seeing increasing numbers of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to explore new developments in use of oral hypoglycemics during pregnancy. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: All the literature on screening for GDM offers level III evidence. Much of the literature on treatment is also level III, but newer studies offer level I evidence and are more useful for daily practice. Existing research leaves many important questions unanswered; research findings are inconsistent among studies, and treatment strategies are challenging to implement. MAIN MESSAGE: Recent studies have clarified that rates of neonatal mortality and congenital malformations are not higher among the offspring of mothers with GDM. Treatment might affect birth weight, but whether treatment is associated with reductions in rates of shoulder dystocia and cesarean section is unclear. Several level I studies conclude that the oral hypoglycemic glyburide can be used safely and effectively during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Management of GDM remains a controversial area in obstetric care. It is a growing area of research, and new developments that might clarify risk and simplify treatment are expected in the coming years.

PMID: 15934273 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PMCID: PMC1472928

Patient Drug Information