Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):367-79.

Colorectal cancer screening: physician recommendation is influential advice to Marylanders.

Author information

  • 1The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, MD 21205, USA. agilbert@jhsph.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In comparison to the United States, Maryland is facing a significantly higher burden of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The primary objective of this study was to determine the predictors of colorectal cancer screening use in Maryland.

METHODS:

We performed secondary analyses on Maryland Cancer Survey 2002 data from 2994 respondents to investigate important predictors for individual colorectal cancer screening tests. CRC screening outcomes were defined as (1) FOBT within the past year, (2) sigmoidoscopy within the past 5 years, or (3) colonoscopy within the past 10 years.

RESULTS:

We found that clinician recommendation for a screening test is the best predictor in both age categories (50-64 years and 65+ years); it is a very strong indicator and consistently improves the odds of use by a factor of at least 8 for any screening test.

CONCLUSIONS:

There remains a great need for improved colorectal cancer screening in Maryland. According to our results, it is clear that the most influential way to improve overall colorectal cancer screening for each test and both age groups is to increase clinician recommendation for these tests.

PMID:
15917034
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk