Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jun;59(6):512-6.

A philosophical analysis of the Hill criteria.

Author information

  • 1Centre for Alcohol Research, National Institute of Public Health, Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark. lct@niph.dk

Abstract

The epidemiological literature contains an ongoing and diversified discussion of the Hill criteria. This article offers a philosophical analysis of the criteria, showing that the criteria are related to two different views of causality. The authors argue that the criteria of strength, specificity, consistency, experiment, and biological gradient are related to a probabilistic regularity view of causality, whereas the criteria of coherence, plausibility, and analogy are related to a generative view of causality. The criterion of temporality is not related to either view, but may in contrast be central in inferring direction from cause to effect. The authors illuminate the aim and limitations of the various criteria that need to be included when discussing them.

PMID:
15911649
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1757057
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk